logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안양지원 2017.12.21 2017가단9433
건물명도 등
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

(b) From July 24, 2017, KRW 2,185,860 and KRW 24.

Reasons

1. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;

2. Determination

(a) Judgment without holding any claim for return of unjust enrichment equivalent to the transfer of buildings, unpaid management expenses, overdue rent or rent (Article 208 (3) 1 of the Civil Procedure Act);

B. On the ground that the instant lease contract was terminated on the ground of the Defendant’s delay in rent, the Plaintiff filed a claim for rent in arrears, etc. on the ground that the said lease contract was terminated on the ground of the Defendant’s delay in rent, and the Defendant also claimed payment of the unpaid lease deposit amount of KRW 2 million.

However, since the lease contract of this case was terminated, the claim for the refund of the unpaid lease deposit, which is premised on the existence of the above lease contract in force, is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow