1. The Defendants: (a) each of the Plaintiff KRW 10,000,000; and (b) Defendant B Association from September 5, 2015; and (c) Defendant C from September 2015.

Basic Facts

The defendant Association is an organization established with the purpose of cooperating in the implementation of the national responsibilities related to the Seoul Special Metropolitan City D projects, demonstrating the public interest of E projects, and promoting mutual friendship and welfare of its members. The defendant C is a representative director of the defendant Association, and the plaintiff was elected as a representative of the defendant Association on February 5, 2012.

On August 17, 2012, the Defendant Association adopted a resolution to dismiss the Plaintiff at an extraordinary general meeting (hereinafter “instant resolution to dismiss the Plaintiff”).

On November 9, 2012, the Plaintiff filed a provisional disposition seeking suspension of the validity of the resolution to dismiss the instant expulsion with the Seoul Eastern District Court 2012Kahap1565, and the said application was accepted (hereinafter “the instant provisional disposition order”).

The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking confirmation of invalidity of the instant expulsion Resolution with Seoul Eastern District Court (2012Gahap1419) and rendered a judgment to the effect that “In spite of difficulties that the Plaintiff’s act falls under Article 6 subparag. 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, and 9 of the Enforcement Rule of the Articles of Incorporation of the Defendant Association, the instant expulsion Resolution was unlawful and null and void,” and the said judgment became final and conclusive by the Supreme Court rendered a judgment dismissing the appeal on February 28, 2014.

(2) The Plaintiff’s assertion of the parties to the judgment as to the claim for unpaid allowances against the Defendant Association of the entire purport of the pleadings and the provisional disposition of this case was made against the expulsion resolution of this case, and the Plaintiff did not notify the general meeting of the Defendant Association of the general meeting, the general meeting of the general meeting, and the meeting of the welfare council, and did not prepare the Plaintiff’s name cards or jobs on the general meeting of the Plaintiff.

In addition, the defendant association is the representative of the plaintiff.