A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 10, 2012, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Southern District Court of the Jeonju on February 10, 2012, and a summary order of KRW 3 million for the same crime in the same court on September 7, 2012, respectively.

1. On February 13, 2013, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) (hereinafter referred to as “driving”). On February 13, 2013, at around 150, the Defendant driven G string cargo under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.147% without obtaining a driver’s license in a section of about 150 meters from the front day of the stable of D located in the Jeonbuk-gun-gun, North Korea, to the front day of the house of F in E.

2. On February 18, 2013, at around 09:00 on February 18, 2013, the Defendant: (a) under the influence of alcohol without a driver’s license, driven G ice truck, and was controlled by a police officer; and (b) on February 18, 2013, at the Defendant’s house located in the Hah-gun, the Defendant: (c) controlled I as the fact that he driven under the influence of alcohol during the period from February 13, 2013 to the F’s house; (d) on the same ground, the Defendant was punished for driving under the influence of alcohol twice, and thus, (c) led I to a false statement.

Therefore, at around 16:00 on February 19, 2013, the above I was investigated as a witness for the case of violation of the Road Traffic Act by the defendant at the K box of the Suwon Police Station located in J as of February 16, 2013, and around 13:00 on February 13, 2013, the above I was driving of the G string cargo of the defendant on behalf of the defendant from the front day of the stable in the D, located in the Jeonbuk-gun, Da to the front day of the house of F in E.

A false statement was made to the effect that it is “....”

Accordingly, the defendant instigated I to escape the criminal.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol of suspect examination of I by the prosecution;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A written statements on the preparation of L;

1. The circumstantial report of an employee;