The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

The Defendant only tried to see the defense at the time and place stated in the facts charged, and did not engage in a public performance and obscenity.

Judgment

According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, such as video CDs duly adopted and examined by the Defendant, which had taken the surrounding areas of the vehicle, and has shown a fluorial figure by hand, the fact that the Defendant had obscenity, as recorded in the facts charged, can be acknowledged.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit

[However, Article 25(1) of the Regulations on Criminal Procedure adds "Article 2 of the Act on Welfare of Persons with Disabilities (Act No. 15904, Dec. 11, 2018)" to the end of the part of "1. Employment restriction order" among the application of the Act.

.