The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

The Defendant did not have made a statement as stated in the facts charged in this case, and even if such a statement was made, the Defendant’s statement was not contrary to the social rules and thus, the illegality is dismissed (definite or misunderstanding of legal principles). 2. The Defendant also asserted the same as the grounds for appeal in this case, and the lower court rejected the Defendant’s assertion by clearly explaining the Defendant’s assertion and its decision in detail under the title “Determination on the Defendant’s and his defense counsel’s assertion.” In comparison with the records, the lower court’s judgment is just and acceptable, and according to the document delivery commission (e.g., simple statement in response) submitted by the Defendant at the trial, according to the above judgment of the lower court, the Defendant stated that “F will take the floor (the Defendant and F) and will take the place of a presentation,” and this cannot be viewed as evidence consistent with the facts charged in this case.

There is no error of misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles, and the above argument is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the conclusion is groundless.