1. On May 23, 2018, the Defendant filed a motion to nullify the change of disposition C, which belongs to the Plaintiff and the Intervenor joining the Defendant.

On March 1, 2002, the Plaintiff was newly appointed as a college of education, computer education, and assistant professor at D University (hereinafter “instant school”) on March 1, 2002. A person promoted as professor on March 1, 201, and the Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) is a juristic person operating the instant school.

On December 10, 2015, the instant school teachers’ disciplinary committee, including the progress of a prior suit, decided to dismiss the Plaintiff by recognizing the following grounds for disciplinary action, and the Intervenor dismissed the Plaintiff on December 16, 2015.

(A) On January 1, 2015, the Plaintiff, while taking abnormal classes, violated the students’ right to teach by opening two weeks after opening the course of “Information Education Evaluation (AP1)” and “Information Education Research (AP2)” and by allowing students to submit a certain course of study without taking lessons in the class.

(hereinafter “former Disciplinary Reason No. 1”) 2. The Plaintiff failed to prepare a class plan on February 2, 2008, and caused the Plaintiff to impair students’ right to teach because it did not give other students an opportunity to attend the school due to defective preparation of the class plan as stipulated by the school regulations.

(2) On February 24, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a petition for review against the Defendant, and the Defendant rendered a decision to revoke the previous dismissal disposition on the ground that the grounds of the previous No. 1 and No. 2 disciplinary action against the Plaintiff were deemed to be excessive, on the grounds that the previous dismissal disposition was excessive.

(hereinafter “instant previous decision”). The Intervenor filed a lawsuit against the Defendant with the Seoul Administrative Court seeking the revocation of the instant previous decision, and the Seoul Administrative Court (2016Guhap65152) is deemed to have all the grounds for the previous disciplinary action, but all the instant grounds for the first and second disciplinary action are deemed to be applicable to the Plaintiff.