Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 11,679,443 as well as 5% per annum from September 5, 2018 to November 8, 2018 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
(1) On September 21, 2016, the Defendant issued a contract to the Plaintiff on September 21, 2016, setting the construction cost of KRW 65,00,000, construction period of KRW 472,00,00, and the construction of a new building of a prefabricated-type structure of KRW 33.75 square meters (hereinafter “instant construction”) from September 21, 2016.
B. The Plaintiff completed the instant construction on December 22, 2016, and the use of the instant construction was changed to the type 2 neighborhood living facilities 9.45 square meters, the type 1 story, the type 2 neighborhood living facilities 9.45 square meters, the type 3.75 square meters, and the prefabricated structure 47.62 square meters.
Article 65,00,000 won was paid to the Plaintiff from September 21, 2016 to November 11, 2016.
x. However, the Plaintiff’s instant construction work is attached to the attached Form.
1. It is necessary to pay KRW 2,736,100 to repair defects, such as defects entered in the defect repair statement, and to pay KRW 2,736,100.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, appraiser D's appraisal result, and the fact inquiry result on March 12, 2018 against the above appraiser, the purport of the whole pleadings as a whole.
2. Judgment on the ground of the Plaintiff’s claim
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion at the Defendant’s request that added a total of KRW 14,415,543 to the instant construction works.
Attached Form to the instant Corporation run by the Plaintiff
1. Since there are defects identical to the entries and the defendant needs to disburse KRW 2,736,100 as the defect repair cost, if the defendant deducts the defect repair cost, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff a total of KRW 11,679,443 ( KRW 14,415,543 - KRW 2,736,100).
B. In full view of the appraisal results of the judgment appraiser D and the fact-finding results of the above appraiser, the plaintiff and the defendant are attached to the judgment below.
2. The Plaintiff agreed to undertake additional construction works, such as the entry of the details of the additional construction works, and brought about KRW 14,415,543 as additional construction costs entered in the same list by December 22, 2016.