Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.
However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On September 19, 2013, the Defendants resisted the victim G(31 years of age) at the front of the original city of 01:07, on the ground that the victim G (31 years of age) resisted to “I am hicking about why she walked in driving the vehicle, and why she would be hicked,” the Defendant B hicked the victim’s face by drinking, and the Defendant A hicked the victim’s face at one time, and walked the victim’s face, with the impact of the escape, and the victim escaped, and the victim escaped and walks the front of the front of the front of the city of 1:07, the victim walked the front of the taxi and walked the front of the front of the front of the city of 201, and continued to walk the victim’s face at one time through the victim’s side to assist the taxi engineer, and the victim’s body and body need to take care of the victim, and the Defendants and the victim’ body continued to take care.
Accordingly, the Defendants jointly inflicted an injury on the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ legal statement
1. Each police statement of G and H;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to on-site photographs and death diagnoses;
1. Relevant Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the defendants who choose to commit a crime;
1. Defendant B of a suspended execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter referred to as “contributable circumstances”)
1. Defendant B: Defendant A, with the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, was sentenced to the suspended sentence of one year and six months on April 13, 2012 due to a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective injury, deadly weapons, etc.) in the original branch of the Chuncheon District Court on April 13, 2012, and was sentenced to the suspended sentence of three years and six months on April 21, 2012, and the judgment became final and conclusive and conclusive, and again committed the instant crime without being aware of it during the suspended sentence period, and was not recovered from damage, and thus, the Defendants reflects mistakes, and Defendant B, other than