logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.11.27 2014나18096
구상금
Text

1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the first instance court's judgment, except in cases where part of the judgment of the first instance is rewritten or added as follows 2. Thus, it is citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. A “FFFFF” shall be applied to the part in which the first instance judgment is re-written or added, and the second second second last of the judgment of the first instance is to be “FFFFF stock company.”

The "(Article 2.... of the Basic Contract)" shall be re-written as "(Article 2... of the Additional Contract)."

The phrase “B Nos. 1, 3, and 6” shall be re-written with “B No. 1, 2, 3, and 6” in the 8th fiveth sentence of the first instance court.

The term "each statement alone" in the 9th 10th th of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be re-written as "each statement and testimony of the witness L of the court of first instance only".

The following contents shall be added between "(9) and "(12)" of the judgment of the first instance.

The case holding that: (a) △△△ is part of the analysis phase, which is the prior screen work to understand the work and to consult on customer requirements; (b) △△△ is ordinarily taking up 18-19% of the total progress phase; (c) △△△ is ordinarily taking up 7 fields (personal management, accounting management, material management, business management, transportation management, material management, executive information); and (d) the Defendant submitted the calculation only for three fields (personnel management, accounting management, material management, material management); and (e) three sectors (personnel management, financial management, material management); and (e) the amount of service payment and service payment attached to the “F private investment project information system contract” concluded between F and the Plaintiff’s supplementary participant.

arrow