A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

On July 5, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of forging private documents in the Gwangju District Court's net support on July 5, 2016, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 13, 2016.

The Defendant, from September 15, 2003 to September 14, 2007, and from September 15, 2009 to September 14, 2013, was engaged in the receipt and distribution of compensation upon the filing of a lawsuit seeking compensation for damage to which the Government of Japan paid the Chairperson of C Hospital Residents' Self-Governing Council, representing one Center, from September 15, 2009 to September 14, 2013.

1. On December 10, 2013, the Defendant received KRW 283,712,591 of the compensation for KRW 283,712,591, from the Office of Original Self-Governing Council of the C Hospital located in Yong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Seoul on December 10, 2013, and deposited KRW 283,712,591 of the death, into the post office account in the name of the original Self-Governing Council of the C Hospital in the name of C Hospital, and the victim’s indictment was the victim’s death. However, in the case of distribution claim by distribution of the special relative No. 2013, 2013, Gwangju, as the Family Self-Governing Council of the C Hospital’s Original Self-Governing Council of Korea, the Defendant received the said compensation, and then the victim was corrected to the above original self

The same assertion is that there is no possibility that the defense counsel might interfere with the defendant's exercise of his/her right to defense, and it is recognized ex officio without changing the indictment.

C During the custody of C Hospital Life Self-Governing Council, a prosecutor of KRW 86,712,591, out of the above money, revised the indictment to change the amount of the charge from KRW 113,712,591 to KRW 106,212,591. Of the money used by the Defendant, the remainder, excluding KRW 170,000,000, which was handed over to the Self-Governing Council, and KRW 27,000,000, which was acquitted by the latter, was stated as “86,712,591,” as the amount of embezzlement.

However, in the judgment of innocence, the prosecutor did not consider the amount changed in the indictment but acquitted all of the above KRW 27,00,000.

The withdrawal shall be made under the name of the defendant at the expense of the defendant.