logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.03.11 2015고단2059
도로법위반
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. On August 27, 1993, A, an employee of the Defendant, operated the Defendant’s business after loading and operating freight of 10 ton of 10 ton of B truck on the street in front of the 1 axis of the National Highway 23, YYYYYYY, YYYYYY, YYYYY, YYYY, YYYY, YYY, YYYY, YYYY, YYYYY, YYYYYY, YYYYY, YYYYY, YYYY, YYY, YY

2. Determination and conclusion of the facts charged in this case, the part corresponding to Article 86 of the former Road Act, which is both punishment provisions, was rendered a decision of unconstitutionality that the decision of the Constitutional Court is in violation of the Constitution. Accordingly, the above provision of the Act was retroactively invalidated.

Therefore, since the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, it is so decided as per Disposition by the Supreme Court Decision 440 of the Criminal Procedure Act and the summary of this decision under Article 58 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow