The defendant shall be innocent.

The summary of the facts charged of this case is that the defendant is not a father of the D President, and there is no fact that he managed the funds of the President. Despite the fact that the Industrial Bank did not have a deposit equivalent to 60 billion won, the victim did not have an intent or ability to get a loan of 20 billion won from the Industrial Bank, the defendant did not have an intent or ability to get a loan of 20 billion won from the Industrial Bank on January 2013 as if the defendant was the father of the D President, and he did not have an intent or ability to get a loan of 60 billion won from the Industrial Bank, and he did not have an intent or ability to get a loan of 20 billion won in the Industrial Bank, and he did not receive a loan of 20 billion won in the Industrial Bank from 200 billion won under the name of the president of the D President's non-laundry funds, the defendant would have a deposit of 60 billion won in the Industrial Bank from 300 billion won in Seoul, and he would receive a loan of 200 billion won in Seoul.

2.8. The same year from time when the victim received 6 million won from the victim under the pretext of the expenses, etc. for the establishment of the company for the laundry of the President's laundry in the same place.

4. By no later than the date unfortunate, the Defendant obtained a total of KRW 89,40,000 from 13 times to 13 times under the name of the establishment cost, etc. of a company for laundry or laundry for bank loans by the foregoing means, as shown in the attached Form “the suspicion of taking advantage of letter.”

On the other hand, while the Defendant was acting as if he were in the relationship with the president, etc., he did not receive a total of KRW 45 million, among KRW 20 million and KRW 26 million as stated in Section 10, and KRW 25 million as stated in Section 10, and agreed to work with G.