logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2018.06.19 2018가단926
청구이의
Text

1. The Defendant’s decision on April 22, 2010 on the Plaintiff is based on the Daegu District Court Decision 2009 Ghana23181 Decided April 22, 2010.

Reasons

1. The defendant with the indication of the claim is the person acquiring the bonds of the promotion savings bank, and there is a remaining bond of 15,762,205 won based on the judgment stated in the purport of the claim.

In addition, this Court issued a collection order, 2017 other debt 1498.

The decision became final and conclusive upon the bankruptcy and decision of immunity as the Changwon District Court 2017Haak250 (2017Haak249).

It is unreasonable for the Defendant to issue an order of seizure and collection with the exempted claim, since it is not a malicious omission, even though the instant claim was omitted in the list of creditors at the time of the above bankruptcy and application for immunity, and thus, the Defendant’s claim is deemed a exempted claim.

2. Judgment with no ground for recognition (Article 208 (3) 1, and Article 257 of the Civil Procedure Act);

arrow