logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.01.10 2017가단202844
토지
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The G, G, H, I, and J, written in the Gyeonggi-gun E-ri land survey division (hereinafter “instant land survey division”) of Gyeonggi-do in the Japanese colonial era, was divided into 456 square meters [52 square meters from the above land on March 14, 1996, 52 square meters of Gyeonggi-gun L road in Gyeonggi-gun, Gwangju-gun on September 18, 1996, and 20 square meters of MM on September 18, 1996, respectively, and on March 21, 2001, the administrative district of Gwangju-si L (hereinafter “first land”).

(2) M (hereinafter referred to as “instant land”)

) It is written that each change was made in the circumstances.

B. The F died on May 17, 1939; G: H on July 26, 1921; H on May 11, 194; H on July 194; J on July 19, 2919; and on December 2, 1918, respectively; the Plaintiff A was the son of F; Plaintiff B was the son of H; Plaintiff C was the son of H; Plaintiff C was the son of I; and Plaintiff D was the son of J.

C. On the other hand, the Republic of Korea completed each of the registration of initial ownership (hereinafter “each of the instant registration of initial ownership”) with respect to the land No. 1 in Suwon District Court, Sung-nam Branch of Gwangju District Court as the receipt No. 10817, Mar. 14, 1996, and with respect to the land No. 2 in this case as the receipt of September 18, 1996 by the same registry office as the receipt of No. 4378

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 9 (including each number in the case of additional number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. We examine the identity of the plaintiffs' prior to the division of land Nos. 2 through 6, Gap's evidence Nos. 10 through 12 (including each number), and the overall purport of arguments and arguments as follows: ① F, H, I, and J are the same names of the plaintiffs' names as H, I, P, Q, and Chinese characters, ② The addresses of the names of the names of the situations stated in the land research book of this case, ② the addresses of the plaintiffs' evidence Nos. 2 through 6, and N, the permanent domiciles of the plaintiffs' evidence Nos. 10 through 12 (including each number number), and the permanent domiciles of the plaintiff's evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 10 through 12, respectively,

arrow