A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 30, 201, the Defendant: (a) around 03:15, the Defendant was punished for trial expenses for the reason that the Victim D (29 tax) was fluored by the Defendant, and that the Victim D (29 tax) was fluored by the Defendant. On May 30, 201, the Defendant was fluor of a double wall, which requires approximately three weeks of treatment to the victim by fluoring the beer’s left side of the wall.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect of each police officer against the defendant or D;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Although Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act does not relax the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence, a sentence shall be imposed in consideration of the following factors: (a) the occurrence of contingent crimes; (b) the smooth agreement with the victim; and (c) the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, criminal experience, etc.