The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the fact-finding) did not threaten police officers as stated in the facts constituting a crime in the judgment of the court below by threatening them to fire within the D District as stated in the judgment below.

2. The court below consistently stated the following circumstances, i.e.,: ① the Defendant citing gasoline in the D District as soon as possible when he/she controlled the act of arranging sexual traffic, ② the Defendant’s seizure and return his/her own money; ② the Defendant’s arrest after he/she was arrested; ③ the Defendant’s police officer arresting the witness and the Defendant did not return his/her money from the investigative agency to the court of the court below; ④ the Defendant did not express his/her intention to dismiss the Defendant; ④ even if the Defendant did not express his/her intention to dismiss, considering the circumstances leading up to the crime of this case and the circumstances at the time of the crime, etc., the court below’s judgment can be recognized fully based on the following circumstances:

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.