logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.08.28 2014고단1202
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Since 2010, the Defendant was unable to repay money after receiving a loan from a financial institution. Since 2010, the Defendant had no intent or ability to repay money to clients even if it was borrowed money from others because there was no particular property or import, such as the closure of the business, etc. of the Defendant’s operation, even though it was promoted from around 2011, it was not proper to recruit franchises, but it was not proper to recruit franchises.

The Defendant, in relation to the establishment of a franchise store in the Jeonbuk-si, the Jeonbuk-si, a member of the said member shop, did not intend to provide the test fees, etc. to the operator of the said member shop. However, the Defendant, on February 2, 2013, was willing to use money for the purpose of lending money from the victim D (the age of 30) known to him/her around February 2013, such as the cost of subsidizing the Doc

1. On April 17, 2013, the Defendant: (a) used smartphone display car Kakaoox, etc. to pay to the victim D; (b) obtained a loan from the owner of the franchise to use the franchise fee, the tegrology and the collection cost; (c) but was unable to obtain a loan due to the failure to complete construction of the franchise fee, the tegrative and collection cost; and (d) obtained a loan from the owner of the franchise to use the franchise fee, the tegrative and collection cost; and (e) obtained a loan from the victim D by means of smartphone display car Kaox; and (e) obtained a loan from the owner of the franchise; and (e) obtained a loan by using the franchise fee

The Defendant received 14 million won from the victim to the single bank account in the name of the Defendant on the same day.

2. On April 27, 2013, the Defendant concluded that “Around April 27, 2013, the Defendant would make payment to the victim D by leasing KRW 20,000,00,000 to the household and the house purchase cost of the exclusive store.”

The Defendant received KRW 16 million from the victim to the single bank account in the name of the Defendant on the same day, and KRW 4 million from the Defendant to the new bank account in the name of the Defendant or E on the 30th of the same month.

3...

arrow