logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.05.13 2015가합520780
지분이전등기 청구
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The Plaintiff, etc. purchased real estate on the joint name, E, N,O, and the Plaintiff, etc., with an indication of 33,521 square meters G forest G 33,801 square meters and 23,802 square meters of H forest 23,802 square meters and 59,008 square meters of 59,008 square meters of forest land and 21,421 square meters of 21,421 square meters of 15,000 square meters of 21,421 square meters of 21,421 square meters of 33,058 square meters of 154,156 square meters of 156 square meters of 154,156 square meters of 33,058 square meters of 156 square meters of 33,000, March 8, 1988, written certification of the following content (a evidence No. 1, a notary public, 1988 square meters of hereinafter referred to “this case”).

In addition, on April 5, 2006, E’s statement of performance (No. 2, hereinafter “the instant statement of performance”) was prepared as follows, and the signature and impediment of “E” was affixed to the lower end of the said statement of performance.

The indication of real estate in the letter of performance: The Plaintiff purchased the real estate area of 154,156 square meters in the total real estate area of the above indication in G, H, L, I (hereinafter, forest, forest, and field), M, J, K (hereinafter, prior to), in the last 1988, four persons, including E, the Plaintiff, N, andO, registered under the agreement of four persons for convenience, but 33,058 square meters in the total area of 154,156 square meters (including 2,00 square meters regardless of the official document) in the Plaintiff’s ownership interest in the portion of the Plaintiff. Thus, on March 8, 1988, four persons jointly prepared a deed of notarial deed. The period of notarial deed was agreed to settle the amount according to the shares of each person, while the period of notarial deed was expired, the Plaintiff’s share was sold to the Plaintiff as soon as possible without any relation.

On April 5, 2006, each letter above: Plaintiff E E, on the other hand, and on each real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each real estate of this case”), the separate sheet on November 26, 1987.

arrow