Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for seven years, for six years, for Defendant B, for two years and six months, for Defendant C, and for Defendant D.

Punishment of the crime

【Defendant A sentenced two years to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny) at Jeju District Court on October 18, 2012, and completed the execution of the sentence at Jeju Prison on March 31, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】 On March 2015, the Defendants conspiredd the victim H (the 49 years of age) who operates a mixed singingingel singingingingman with a view to drinking water and taking money and valuables into force.

The part of the facts charged in the indictment of this case states that "the person who voluntarily withdraws money and valuables is drinking exempted, and the person who voluntarily withdraws money and valuables is in accordance with the proposal of Defendant D, and the defendant A, B, and D contests about whom the person who proposed each of the crimes of this case was a person.

The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court of this case, i.e., ① Defendant B made the second and third statements made by the police, i.e., Defendant A made the statement that he would prepare for exemption first, and all 4 persons consented thereto. However, Defendant A made a statement at the prosecutor’s office that Defendant D proposed each of the crimes in this case. Defendant A again reversed this in this court, and made a statement that Defendant A proposed each of the crimes in this case. ② Defendant A suggested first of all of the crimes in this case. However, Defendant A suggested that Defendant D offered exemption first from each of the crimes in this case and directly stolen property. However, Defendant A appears to have been the principal; Defendant A appears to have been aware of the fact that Defendant A was friendly with drinking and drinking alcohol; Defendants were friendly with Defendant A, double Defendants A, B, and D’s criminal conviction and robbery on several occasions, and each of the crimes in this case presented by the prosecutor’s office in light of the mutual agreement between each of the aforementioned Defendants.

1...