The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Defendant

In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal by defense counsel (unfair form of punishment) that the defendant recognized the mistake of the defendant, committed the crime of this case by contingency while under the influence of alcohol, and there are circumstances that the victim C first caused the defendant to commit the crime of injury in advance, the victim C and E expressed their intent not to be punished by the defendant, and the defendant deposited the amount equivalent to the repair cost of the patrol vehicle to compensate for the damage caused by the crime of damaging public goods in this case, etc., the sentence of the court below that sentenced six months to imprisonment is too unreasonable.

Judgment

The crime of this case is not good for the defendant to have damaged public goods by walking the face of the victim C at a time beyond the floor of the victim C, facing the face of the victim E, walking the victim E at several times and walking the body of the victim so that he/she can walk the body of the victim so that he/she can grow up, and is arrested as a flagrant offender and walking the patrol vehicle at several times during the patrol, and walking the driver's seat, the rear door, and the ceiling, etc. of the patrol vehicle during the patrol, and damaged the public goods. The defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months on May 7, 2014 and was sentenced to a suspension of execution for the same time on April 17, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive as he/she had already been sentenced to imprisonment for a violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (Habitual violence) and has already been sentenced to criminal punishment during the execution period of each of the above crimes. The court below's punishment was more favorable for each of the above crimes in addition to the punishment period of this case.