1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

A. From August 1, 2017 to October 16, 2019, KRW 316,350,000 and KRW 235,00,00 among them.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The parties concerned are those who are in charge of the management chairperson of Daegu-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C (hereinafter “instant commercial building”), and the husband of the plaintiff is between the husband and the elementary school building.

B. The Plaintiff and the Defendant prepared a certificate of borrowing KRW 50,00,000 on August 20, 2013 between the Plaintiff and the Defendant (hereinafter “instant certificate of borrowing”) with the effect that the Defendant borrowed KRW 2,00,000 on a monthly interest (20,000 on August 20, 2015) and August 19, 2015, respectively (hereinafter “instant certificate of borrowing”).

(2) On September 1, 2013, the Defendant prepared a certificate of borrowing KRW 1,00,000,000, interest rate of KRW 50,000 per month between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff as of August 30, 2015, respectively.

(hereinafter referred to as “the instant loan certificate”. 3) The Defendant drafted between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff an instrument of borrowing KRW 1,200,000 on October 25, 2013 (the 24th day of each month) and the 24th day of October 24, 2015 (hereinafter “the instant certificate of borrowing”). The Defendant drafted a loan certificate with the content of borrowing KRW 50,000 on October 25, 2013 (hereinafter “the instant certificate of borrowing”).

(4) On November 6, 2013, the Defendant prepared a certificate of borrowing KRW 1,200,000 per month interest on KRW 50,000 between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff as of November 5, 2015, respectively.

(C) On the other hand, on February 19, 2014 between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff on February 28, 2014, the Defendant prepared a certificate of borrowing (hereinafter “certificate of borrowing of the instant pharmacy deposit”) stating that “if the Plaintiff is unable to open a pharmacy by February 28, 2014, KRW 235,000,000 shall be refunded in full, and until the refund is made, it shall be calculated at 1% per month (hereinafter “the certificate of borrowing of the instant pharmacy deposit”).” (1) The Defendant, even if having received the lease deposit from the Plaintiff with respect to a pharmacy established in each of the instant shopping mall D, E, and F, the Defendant presented it to the Plaintiff, and then let the Plaintiff make a sublease contract between the Plaintiff and the former Pharmaceutical and the Defendant newly established.