A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is engaged in driving BM5 vehicles.

On December 28, 2013, at around 18:38, the Defendant entered the intersection in violation of signal signals in the process that: (a) the right turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn to the front side of the front side of the front side of the 4-distance off from the middle side of the 7-lane East-gu Daejeon Metropolitan City to the red road from the middle side of the 7-lane road; and (b) the right turn turn turn turn to the front side while going slowly; and (c) the yellow turn turn turn to the yellow light.

A person who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to confirm whether a motor vehicle passes through the intersection by checking well the side, and to prevent the accident by driving safely according to the traffic signal in advance.

Nevertheless, even though the signal was replaced by a stop signal, it is continuing to proceed without violating the signal.

From the 5-distance to the area of the Daejeon Hospital, the front part of the DNA vehicle driven by the injured party C(22 years old, South) was shocked by the defendant's left side.

As a result, the Defendant suffered, by negligence in the course of business, injury to the victim C (the 22-year-old) such as salt and tensions of the bones of wood, vegetables and tensions, satises and tensions on both sides, satisfing to the right satisfing, and satisfing, etc., and the victim E (the 22-year-old, South) suffered from injury, such as salt and tensions of the bones of wood bones, satisfe and tensions, and satisfing satisfing, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the traffic accident actual condition investigation report and each medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not seem to have existed even if the defendant had the same criminal record, and even if he had no previous criminal record, he committed the instant crime.

(b).