logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.02.03 2015나20261
용역비반환
Text

1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

The plaintiff's succeeding intervenor's primary and conjunctive claims are all made.

Reasons

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in each of the evidence Nos. 2 and 6-2, 10 and 11.

The purpose of the Plaintiff is to establish a regional housing association under the Housing Act for the implementation of a new apartment construction project in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, etc., and the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor is a regional housing association under the Housing Act established by the Plaintiff on April 3, 2015.

B. On April 22, 2014, 196, 196, 199, 199, 199, 200, 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

Article 1 (Purpose of Contract) The purpose of this Agreement is to clarify the rights, obligations, and responsibilities between "A (Irk Construction, etc. and one other)" and "B (Defendant)" in order to promote the association housing by efficiently purchasing real estate subject to the project.

Article 2 (Real Estate)

1. Location: G worker in Ulsan-gu;

2. Area: Article 4 (Terms and Conditions of Contracts)

1. The obligation of “B” is completed at the time of concluding a contract with a total of at least 95 percent (26,062 square meters among private land 28,712 square meters) among real estate subject to business;

2. This contract shall be null and void if it does not reach the rate of 95 per cent in the project site within 60 days.

Article 5 (Rights and Duties)

2.The agreement entered into with the rights and obligations of “B” shall be submitted to “A” collectively prior to the expiration of the deadline.

C. Until August 2014, the Defendant entered into a purchase contract with respect to at least 95% of the business site, and submitted a sales contract stating that the purchaser is “Irk Construction and one other” for the increase of the sales contract, and the Plaintiff is the same year.

9.4. &

9.12. The service charges of KRW 36,663,00 to the defendant via Asian Trust Co., Ltd.

arrow