1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The plaintiff is seeking the unpaid rent against the defendant under the premise that the contract was concluded between the defendant and the defendant on the land in Chungcheongnam-gun budget group C.

However, even if all evidence submitted by the Plaintiff were considered, it is difficult to view that the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant’s individual, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Rather, examining the lease contract (No. 2) submitted by the Plaintiff, the tenant column of the above contract includes the "Da," the business registration number, and the name of the defendant, and the seal impression of D, a corporation other than the defendant's personal seal, is affixed at the bottom of the defendant's name. Thus, the tenant of the above lease contract should be deemed to be a corporation, not the defendant, but D

Therefore, the Plaintiff’s claim of this case premised on the premise that the Defendant is a lessee of a lease agreement is without merit.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.