The judgment below

The parts against Defendant A, B, D, and U among them shall be reversed.

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for six years, and for defendant D.

1. Grounds for appeal which is a type of appeal filed by the original court, which is the main point of the grounds for appeal;

1. The defendant who had been sentenced to eight years imprisonment with prison labor for A: Error of facts and the defendant who has been sentenced to unfair sentencing: Sentencing; Undue of sentencing;

2. In the case of Defendant Prosecutor who was sentenced to eight years of imprisonment with prison labor, Defendant Prosecutor: misunderstanding of facts, misunderstanding of legal principles, and misunderstanding of sentencing: Improper sentencing.

3. C 5 years of imprisonment and improper sentencing of the defendant;

4. The misunderstanding of facts, misunderstanding of legal principles, and sentencing for seven years of imprisonment

5. misunderstanding of facts, misunderstanding of legal principles, and sentencing for 6 years E imprisonment

6. misunderstanding of facts, misunderstanding of legal principles, and sentencing for six years by imprisonment of F.

7. Illegal sentencing of defendants for two years of imprisonment;

8. The defendant's sentencing of M 3 years imprisonment is unfair;

9. The defendant's misunderstanding of the facts, misunderstanding of the legal principles, and misunderstanding of the sentencing of the defendant 2-year imprisonment with labor of 11. The defendant's 2-year imprisonment with labor of 2-year imprisonment with labor of 11. The defendant's 13-year imprisonment with labor of 2-year imprisonment with labor of 2-year imprisonment with labor of 5 years U, misunderstanding of the legal principles, and misunderstanding of the sentencing of the defendant 2-year imprisonment with labor of 2-year imprisonment with labor of 2-year imprisonment with labor of 3 years AA, 16. Unfair sentencing of the defendant 2-year imprisonment with labor of 2-year AC, 17. The defendant's 2-year imprisonment with labor of 2 years AC and 3-year imprisonment with labor of 20. The defendant's 2-year imprisonment with labor of 20 years A, 3-year imprisonment with labor of 3 years AV and 21. The defendant's 23-year imprisonment with labor of 23 years A.

A. Defendant A - misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of sentencing 1) The Defendant was able to lease and lease the building with the help of Defendant B, on the ground that the “FR” in Taiwan was changed by leasing the building in Korea at Taiwan, and there was no conspiracy with the other Defendants or there was no participation in the phishing crime.

The Defendant and B’s statement of “the general manager of Jeju-do” is merely an unilateral argument for beyond his responsibility. Accordingly, even if the Defendant is not guilty or was involved in the crime, the Defendant is merely an aiding and abetting. C) Nevertheless, despite the fact that the Defendant was found not guilty or was involved in the crime.