beta
Text
1. As to the Plaintiff A’s KRW 101,910,149, Plaintiff B, C, D, and E, respectively, and each of the said money.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. The facts of recognition 1) F is a G Msaw car (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) under the influence of alcohol at around 01:50 on January 26, 201, while under the influence of alcohol at around 01:184% of alcohol content in blood.
(B) On the other hand, the Plaintiff, who was on the part of the Defendant vehicle, was on the left side of the JV vehicle, and was on the part of the Defendant vehicle, caused the injury of the quality mental disorder, etc. (hereinafter “instant accident”). The Plaintiff, who was on the part of the Defendant vehicle, was on the left side of the JV vehicle, due to the negligence of neglecting the duty of the Jeonju City, while driving the JH first road along the two-lanes of the GH from the ndrode of Gwangju Metropolitan City to the 3-lane of Gwangju Metropolitan City to the 3-lane.
2) Plaintiff B is the mother of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C and D are the parents of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff E are the births of Plaintiff A.
3) The defendant is an insurer which has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with respect to the defendant vehicle. [Grounds for recognition] The defendant is an insurer who has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with respect to the defendant vehicle. Each entry in Gap's 1 through 5, 8, and Eul's 4, 6, and 10 (including provisional numbers,
B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case as the insurer of the defendant vehicle.
C. According to the evidence as seen earlier prior to the limitation of liability, F, as the driver of the Defendant’s vehicle, can be found to have caused the instant accident in the course of the Plaintiff’s movement to the Plaintiff’s house after drinking together. In light of all the circumstances revealed in the instant argument, including the purpose of operation of the Defendant’s vehicle, the relationship between the passenger and the driver, the personal relationship with the Plaintiff, and the situation during which the Plaintiff moved to the Defendant’s vehicle, it would be reasonable to adjust the Defendant’s liability to a considerable extent consistent with the good faith or the principle of equity, and thus, such circumstances should be considered when calculating the amount of damages that the Defendant would compensate for.
In addition, in light of the fact that the plaintiff A suffered serious injury, the above plaintiff was involved in the accident of this case.