logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원해남지원 2020.09.10 2020고단199
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On June 25, 2013, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Gwangju District Court's support for the Navy of Gwangju District Court.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around April 20, 2020: (a) on April 23, 2020, the Defendant: (b) driven a wing and freight vehicle B; (c) driven at the end of the land in the south-Namnam-do, South-Namnam-do; (d) driven by the victim C (n, 43 years old) who driven the said intersection to turn to the left at the ebbbb of the ebbbbbb in the ebbbb of the west-do; and (d) driven by the victim C (n, 43 years old) who driven the said intersection from the ebs of the ebb

The Defendant driven the above enclosed truck, which is an object dangerous to the three-lane road in front of the Fgas filling station in front of the F. E., and f.h., driven by the victim's above f.D., which was proceeding along the two-lanes, and speeded by changing the lane to three-lanes, and then changed to the three-lanes, and then changed to the two-lanes, and received the above f.h. side part back to the left side of the above f.h., left behind the left side of the above f.h. vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant, carrying dangerous cargo vehicles, and assaulted the victim, at the same time, damaged the victim's car to be in excess of KRW 715,00 in repairing cost.

2. The Defendant was under the influence of alcohol 0.136% of the blood alcohol concentration at the time and time set forth in paragraph (1) of the Road Traffic Act, and was driving the above 10 km truck from the roads near the Hcafeteria located in the Southern Navy G to the roads in front of the above Fgas filling station.

Accordingly, the defendant violated Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a report on the actual condition of the traffic accident, and the closure of CCTV images;

1. Images recorded in black stuffs, etc.;

1. Written estimates (D) 1.

arrow