logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.07.27 2017고정654
모욕
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. On November 22, 2013, at around 16:43, the summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) Internet media access to the Defendant’s residence located in Daejeon Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu website to the following Internet media; (b) follow up with DNA “C”; and (c) to slander the Victim E in the article of “D”; and (d) the Defendant’s attempt to defame the Victim E.

With respect to the family members who died on duty in a sound manner, * show*.

* In the event of insult and fluoring, he/she would have received a criminal complaint under the criminal civil law of the test based on the three kinds of glusium flusium, which would have been distorted and fluored.

Before doing so, the author posted a comments on the following: “I am going away from the direction of the ideology, I am flick, and I am flick. I am flick and flick.”

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

Reasons for dismissing the public prosecution (crimes of friendship) Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 327 subparag. 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act (Revocation of Complaints after Public Prosecution)

arrow