A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Punishment of the crime

"2015 Highest 1125"

1. The Defendant and B jointly committed the crime committed by the Defendant and B, as they were unemployed at the time, were faced with economic difficulties due to no special import, and they decided to conduct a business that could make a lot of profits available for a short period of time, and accordingly, the Defendant and B operated the loan business office on a separate basis.

On May 2, 2012, the defendant and B are required to pay the victim D the profits from the operation of the office. The defendant and B are required to operate the loan business office in the business office of mutual infinite-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

1. As seen, the Plaintiff made a false statement to the effect that the Plaintiff was “.”

However, in fact, the Defendant and B did not have business experience and did not have any intention or ability to repay the borrowed money to the victim by operating the loan business office even if they borrowed money from the damaged party due to economic difficulties.

Nevertheless, the defendant and B were co-defendants E from damage victims.

B is his father and son.

The F Bank Account (G) in the name of the F Bank Account was remitted to KRW 6 million, and from that time to May 7, 2012, the F Bank Account was issued KRW 27 million in total four times from that time, as shown in attached Table (1) to (2) to (5) of the List of Offenses.

In this respect, the defendant and B had conspiredd the victim and received the property.

2. The Defendant’s sole crime committed on April 25, 2012, at the office of the mutual infinite-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City loan business, would sell to the victim D a person who has become aware of infinite-gu at KRW 1.5 million.

1. As seen, the Plaintiff made a false statement to the effect that the Plaintiff was “.”

However, in fact, since the above person was used in the above office and was disposed of together with the discontinuance of the office, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to give the person who was aware of the victim even if he received the above money from the injured person.

Nevertheless, the defendant is 1.5 million won from the victim's own bank account (I) in his name.