logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.03.20 2014고단214
위증
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

The Defendants did not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A was present at the court of Busan District Court No. 353 on November 22, 2013 in order to take an oath and to testify as a witness against the Defendant’s violation of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act against F, No. 2013, No. 3388, 3937.

The defendant testified that "I would not do so without the defendant's instruction. I would like to answer the question "I would like to see the fact that I would sell over-the-counter drugs to customers without the defendant's instructions," and continuously asked "I would like to see the situation from the time I would like to see the situation that I would like to see. I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see if I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see how I would like to see you will come back after you will come back." The prosecutor continuously testified that "I would like to see that the defendant would like to see I would like to see the symptoms of customers," and the prosecutor's "I would like to see within I would like to see. I would like to see that I would like to do so."

However, at around 20:00 on November 29, 2012, the Defendant served as an employee at the “H pharmacy” established by F in Busan Jung-gu G, and sold medicines to customers who find the place without a pharmacist’s instructions, even if the Defendant sold one cream, an over-the-counter medicine, to customers who find the place without a pharmacist’s instructions, and were not a pharmacy founder.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to memory and raised perjury.

2. Defendant B was present at the court of Busan District Court No. 353 on November 22, 2013 in order to take an oath and to testify as a witness for a violation of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act against F, No. 2013, No. 3388, 3937.

The defendant gives testimony to the prosecutor that "at the time, the defendant was in a dispensary" and continues to exist.

arrow