logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.02.04 2015고단4221
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.

around 16:30 on October 7, 2015, the Defendant continued to make a bypass from the parking lot for the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Welfare Center for the Disabled with Seongbuk-ro 130, to a bypass.

Since there is a road divided between the roadway and the sidewalk, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely operate the steering gear and the brake in order not to violate the delivery by accurately operating the steering gear and the brakes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to report, and received the victim D(66) from the victim D, who continued to go on India, due to his neglect of reporting, and continued to go on India, and suffered injury, such as mination and mination of the left-hand flaps, which requires approximately 10 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A traffic accident report (1) (2) (2)

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the scene of accidents and photographs of harming vehicles;

1. Relevant Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2)9 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is limited to the injury of the victim of this case for the reason of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act. However, considering the following favorable circumstances: (a) the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects the defendant; (b) the above vehicle of the defendant was covered by a comprehensive insurance; (c) the damaged person was not punished by the defendant upon agreement with the victim; and (d) the defendant did not have any record of punishment as the primary offender; and (e) the punishment is determined as ordered by the order, comprehensively taking into account all the factors of sentencing as provided by Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the background of the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime, the age of the defendant

arrow