A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. 도로교통법위반(음주측정거부) 피고인은 2016. 7. 12. 01:26경 아산시 읍내동 소재 읍내 3통 입구 앞 도로에서 술을 마신 상태에서 B 뉴그랜져XG 승용차를 운전하다가 아산경찰서 C지구대 소속 경장 D으로부터 피의자에게서 술 냄새가 나고 보행상태가 비틀거리며 위 차량 운전석의 시동을 켠 채 기어를 ‘D'에 놓고 우측 비석을 충격한 상태로 차량을 정지해 두는 등 술에 취한 상태에서 운전하였다고 인정할 만한 상당한 이유가 있어 약 30분간에 걸쳐 음주측정기에 입김을 불어넣는 방법으로 음주측정에 응할 것을 요구받았다.

그럼에도 피고인은 음주측정기에 입김을 불어넣는 시늉만 하는 방법으로 이를 회피하여 정당한 사유 없이 경찰공무원의 음주측정요구에 응하지 아니하였다.

2. The owner of an automobile violating the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall not operate any vehicle on a road which has not been subscribed for mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated B New franchise XG car without mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. The user ledger of the measuring instruments for drinking;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant laws concerning criminal facts, and Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act (with respect to refusal of measurement), Articles 46 (2) 2 and 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, and choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The fact that an order to attend a lecture is disadvantageous to the fact that the offense was committed despite the same criminal records as the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act.