The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Although misunderstanding the legal doctrine recognizes that the Defendant had a misunderstanding contained in the country of rice tea to the victim U, it does not constitute a dangerous object for the crime of special injury because the temperature of the rice tea station is relatively low.

Nevertheless, the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine, which found the Defendant guilty of the special injury of this case.

B. The Defendant, a mentally and physically weak, was committing the instant crime in a state that the Defendant had the ability to discern things or make decisions due to the side effects of taking drugs for the treatment of mental disorders, such as shock disorder and uneasiness, etc.

(c)

The punishment of the lower court (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Judgment on the misapprehension of legal principles

A. On July 30, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 07:35 on July 30, 2016, to the victim U.S., who divided the instant prison in the first lower-class V room of the said first lower-class room of the said prison; and (b) whether the Defendant “dick the dysteme” to the victim U.S.

“The victim, who was in front of the above confinement room with a scambling with a scambling with a scambling with a view to getting a scambro, which is a dangerous object through an corrosion inside the confinement room, was collected by the victim, and the victim was collected with a scambling with the right hand on the right hand and the right hand on the number of days of treatment.

나. 원심의 판단 원심은, 피해자가 원심에 이르기까지 일관되게 ‘ 피고인이 배식 중이 던 자신을 향해 갑자기 뜨거운 떡국이 담긴 그릇을 집어던져 우측 손 부위가 빨갛게 홍조를 띤 경도 화상을 입었다’ 고 진술하고 있고, 당시 피해자를 진료한 의사가 작성한 소견서의 내용도 위 진술과 일치하며, 가열 조리가 마 쳐지고 5분 정도가 지난 상태의 국물이 피부에 닿을 경우 화상의 원인이 되기에 충분하므로, 이 사건 상해 범행의 도구로 사용된 떡국은 특수 상해죄에서 정한 위험한 물건에 해당한다고 보기에 충분하다 고 판단하였다.

(c)

(1) any object of the review.