A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

Punishment of the crime

On June 14, 2007, the defendant, with respect to the loan of KRW 3.185 million in the name of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., in the name of the defendant in relation to the loan of KRW 3.185 million in the name of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., issued the name of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. and the corporate seal impression, etc. from AF for the purpose of extending the term of the loan with respect to the joint guarantee of the defendant, using it, issued a promissory note in the name of

Therefore, the Defendant: (a) around March 25, 2008, at AH Bank located in Daegu-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Daegu-gu, with the authorization or consent from AF to the issuance of a promissory note in the name of the K-AK; and (b) the Defendant did not have any delegation or consent from the AF to the issuance of the promissory note in the name of the K-AK; (c) on the “issuance Date”; and (d) on the “Date” column, the “Date of Payment” column, “F,” “F,” “F,” “the date of payment,” “the date of payment,” “the place of payment,” and “the place of payment,” respectively, submitted the “amount of the promissory note printed in the “Tgu, Daegu-gu, Seoul” column, “TAF” column and “the issuer” column “the name “AF in the name of the issuer” column, and submitted it to the K-AK bank and the employees in charge of credit settlement as described above.

In order to exercise this, the defendant forged and exercised the securities of the AF issuance of the V representative director.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to AF;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing promissory notes;

1. Article 214 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime (the title of securities) and Articles 217 and 214 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act committed a second offense even if the defendant was punished for the same kind of crime, and the fact that the forged securities have a high face value is disadvantageous.

However, the defendant.