1. Defendant E: (a) KRW 305,463,171; (b) KRW 201,975,447; and (c) KRW 6 of the Defendant Educational Foundation F, respectively, to Plaintiff C and Plaintiff D.

(3) On December 26, 2013, Defendant E, while diagnosing and treating the Deceased, prepared a prescription on strophical loss and diesel, which is an antibiotics, and claimed that the content of the medication was omitted due to system error. However, as seen in the foregoing paragraph (1) (3) above, in light of the fact that the content of the medication is difficult to believe as is, and that there is no reason for Defendant E to prepare a prescription with only the Deceased, at a He Hospital where the medical system is installed, the content of the medication as seen in subparagraph 10-12, 6, and 10-2, it is insufficient to acknowledge that Defendant E prescribed a prescription on December 26, 2013 only with the descriptions in subparagraphs 12, 6, and 10-2, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

(3) On December 26, 2013, Defendant E diagnosed that the infection caused by the degradation of immunity is doubtful, such as where he/she provided treatment to the Deceased on a prompt basis, and where he/she finds the skin and face side of the right chest, and the skin and face side of the chest are found.

On December 27, 2013, the deceased changed rapidly to the size of the right scarcity 7*3 cm on the right side on the 27th day of December, 2013, the high-calorie symptoms continued, and the result of blood examination showed that there was an opinion of infection in terms of leukma.

② As such, in the event of a new infectious disease in an existing infectious disease station’s abandonment, it is rarely likely that a new infectious infection occurred on the original part of the hospital, but rather, it would be accompanied by a fratosis or a fratal propagation on the original part of the hospital. In particular, given that the operation part of the deceased is a negative part, it was suspected that a bratosis was infected.

③ In light of the above conditions of the disease and blood examination, the deceased constitutes an emergency patient because there is a high probability that dystrophism was suspected and accompanied by blood transfusions, and a thorough monitoring of active signs, such as blood pressure, beer, and absorption, was required until transferred to the superior hospital that can give appropriate treatment according to the changed conditions.