Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 2, 2016, the Defendant: (a) on the ground that the victim E (52 years of age) and the victim F (45 years of age) reported this to the police while she was working in the street of “D cafeteria” in front of the food store located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; (b) on the ground that the victim E (52 years of age) and the victim F (45 years of age) reported it to the police; and (c) on the victim E, the Defendant reported it.

I, "I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am," and "I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am

2. On March 2, 2016, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, at around 21:51, and around 112, committed assault by the Defendant: (a) the police box belonging to the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Police Station G police station that was called out after receiving a report on 112, to restrain the Defendant from committing the above crimes; and (b) the Defendant, by hand, assaulted the Defendant of H and I’s chests.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the control of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E, F, H, and I;

1. Written statements of E, F and J;

1. A complaint;

1. A receipt of penalty (related to diveterology);

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (Evidence Nos 2 and 4);

1. Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of each intimidation) and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) of the relevant Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (limited to cases where a person interferes with the execution of each official duty);

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to the order of provisional payment is that if considering the fact that the defendant informed multiple victims of harm and intimidation, and that he exercised the physical power to police officers who perform legitimate duties by suffering from uniform uniform, the nature of the crime is not light;

may be seen.

However, the fact that the defendant is led to confession and is in depth against the victims.