The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. In the facts charged, the Defendant is a person who is in charge of the vice-chairperson of the shopping mall conference while operating a restaurant under the trade name of D from 114 to C, and the victim E (72) is the above shopping mall.

On December 13, 2016, at around 11:20 around 11:20, the Defendant: (a) committed assault against the victim, such as making the victim’s spuger’s selection business entity in preparation for fire-fighting checks; (b) having the victim’s spuger’s chests go beyond the victim’s tight floor on one-time basis; and (c) having the victim’s chests go beyond the victim’s tight floor.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent pursuant to Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the victim withdraws his wish to punish the defendant after the indictment of this case was instituted.