logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.06.17 2014누61080
체류기간연장등불허가처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of this court for the acceptance of the judgment of the first instance is as follows: Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for adding the following judgments:

【The Plaintiff’s assertion regarding the crime against No. 3 is difficult to accept in light of the established facts of the crime, etc., and even if the Defendant received a written statement from the Plaintiff that he did not object to the extension of the period of stay, if he were forced to leave the Republic of Korea at the time of filing an application for the extension of the period of stay, it cannot be deemed that the permission for extension of the

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

arrow