1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

A. Of the second floor of the land building C in Ansan-gu, Ansan-gu, Annyang-si, the indication of the annexed drawings 4, 5, 9, 8, 4.

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments as to Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, on January 12, 2009, the plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the defendant on January 12, 2009, setting the lease agreement amounting to 24 months from February 7, 2009 to February 7, 2011 with respect to the size of 18 square meters inside the ship connecting each point of 4, 5, 9, 8, and 4, among the second floor of the land building Nos. 3 in Ansan-gu, Ansan-gu, Ansan-si, Ansan-si, the plaintiff delivered the real estate of this case to the defendant around that time, and the defendant delivered the real estate of this case to the defendant from June 2, 2015 to June 24, 2016, and notified the defendant of the termination of the lease agreement of this case by mail on the ground that the plaintiff was in arrears by mail.

According to the above facts, the lease contract of this case was terminated by the plaintiff's declaration of intention of termination on the ground of delinquency in rent, barring any special circumstances, and the defendant is obligated to deliver the real estate of this case to the plaintiff, and to return the amount of unjust enrichment equivalent to 3.3 million won per month from June 8, 2015 to May 7, 2016 (=300,000 won x 11 month) and from May 8, 2016 to the date of delivery of the above real estate.

As to this, the defendant asserts that there is a justifiable reason for the failure to pay rent, since the dispute arising between the plaintiff and the plaintiff arises due to noise, but there is no evidence to acknowledge this, the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim shall be accepted on the grounds of its reasoning, and it is so decided as per Disposition.