Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant B, among the real estate in the attached list No. 1, indicated in the attached sheet No. 71, 1, 1, 51, 1, 6.
Reasons
1. Determination as to the cause of the claim (1) around December 20, 1987, the Plaintiff purchased 374m2 from E to 374m2 in Yong-gun, Yong-gun, and occupied the above site from around that time, as the site for a shot tree orchard, a restaurant building, etc. (2) the Plaintiff’s newly constructed building (see e.g., photograph1) and its annexed parking lot beyond the above F site cadastral line are extended to the Defendants’ appraisal map (B), (d), and (f) land (hereinafter “instant dispute land”) beyond the above F site cadastral line. Since the above site and the Defendants’ farmland occupation boundary are spread to 2m wide as above, the Defendants were assigned to the above land boundary line between the Plaintiff’s possession and the Defendants’ possession of the land (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 200Do82088, Apr. 1, 2007).