logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.09.07 2017고단2050
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court on November 23, 2016, and completed the execution of the sentence in Seoul Southern Prison on May 17, 2017.

2. Criminal facts;

A. On June 25, 2017, around 19:00 on June 25, 2017, the Defendant: (a) committed an act as if he/she had the intent or ability to pay the alcohol value to the victim; and (b) ordered alcohol and alcohol to the victim under the “E” operated by the victim D in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the drinking value.

The Defendant received from the injured party one share of 5 Madju with a market price of 40,000 won and one share of 5 Madju.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

B. The thief Defendant lent a Handphone to the victim D who was enjoying in the room located in the above main point at the time and place mentioned in the above paragraph (a). The Defendant borrowed a Handphone from the victim, and borrowed the Handphone from the victim, and then stolen one copy of the credit card with the victim’s new SMORE, which was located in the case of the Handphone Handphone, taken advantage of the victim’s gaps in which the victim’s surveillance was neglected.

(c)

On June 25, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on Finance Business Specializing in Fraud and Credit Financial Business (hereinafter “H”) issued an order for alcohol and alcohol to the employees of the above-mentioned main point in the name in the “H” main point operated by the victim G in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, as if he/she had an intention or ability to pay the alcohol value.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the drinking value.

The Defendant received from the injured party one share of 4 Macju equivalent to the market price of KRW 80,000 from the injured party, and then presented the stolen credit card as if he had legitimate right to use the above D’s credit card, and used the above D’s credit card on three occasions as shown in the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.

arrow