logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.03.24 2017고단20
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 13, 2016, around 23:05, the Defendant requested the victim E (29 tax) who is an employee of the place in Jongno-gu Seoul, to leave a substitute driver on behalf of the victim E (29 tax) at the “D” located in Jongno-gu Seoul on December 13, 2016; however, the Defendant also requested the victim to see that “no person is a driver on behalf of others” from the damaged party, “I have several substitute drivings, why is the vehicle?”

The Defendant spits the victim’s face, which prevents the victim from doing so in his/her hands, with the sound “this sons,” and spits the victim’s face. Then, the Defendant would report it as a interference with the business.

See the word “,” “I am feas, D, C, C, I am feas, D, I amben, D, I amben.

It was hard to say that there was an attorney-at-law and there was a disturbance for 30 minutes.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's work on the management of the telecom by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (the date of the second public trial shall be the date);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order: Ten times the record of violent crime (including once a suspended sentence), the circumstances in which the victim spits, etc. are favorable to the crime by an insulting method, such as spiting or spiting the victim’s face: The part dismissing the public prosecution that has no direct force other than spiting or spiting, etc.

1. On December 13, 2016, at around 23:05, the Defendant requested the victim E (29 years of age) who is an employee of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to leave a substitute driver on his/her behalf at the “D” located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, but he/she heard the phrase “not to have a substitute driver” from the victim, and the victim “I have several substitute drivings, and why is why you will have a bus?”

The term "this rings" is sound.

arrow