beta
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged reveals that the Defendant came to know of the Victim C through the introduction of the branch seal around October 2012, thereby obtaining trust from the injured party while trying to farm business, etc. of the injured party. Upon the need for personal vehicles, the Defendant asked the injured party to purchase the vehicle in the name of the injured party and had the injured party pay the vehicle price.
On November 21, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim that “The Defendant would pay the vehicle installments on the face of the week in which the vehicle was purchased in the name of four, and operate the vehicle to prevent the problem by purchasing the vehicle from being insured.”
However, even if the defendant received the vehicle from the injured party, he did not have any intention or ability to pay installments or to operate the vehicle after purchasing an insurance policy.
After all, the Defendant received one D SP car equivalent to KRW 1,4120,000 from the injured party for the vehicle that was released under the name of the injured party, and had the injured party pay KRW 307,184 as an installment of the vehicle around December 20, 2013, and had the injured party pay KRW 307,184 as an installment of the vehicle from December 20, 2016 from that time until December 20, 2016, and had the injured party pay the full amount of KRW 10,457,232 as stated in the annexed crime list.
2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by each evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, the evidence alone presented by the prosecutor alone proves that the defendant acquired the amount of installment payments from the injured party to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt.
It is difficult to see, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.
① On November 21, 2013, the Defendant called the victim, the registration of provisional seizure, F and G, the creditor, was completed on the land of Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, the victim, and on the above ground buildings.
At this time, the defendant had been working to solve the above provisional seizure problem.