The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The gist of the grounds for appeal by the defendant is that the punishment of the fine of KRW 7,00,00 sentenced by the court below is too unreasonable in light of the circumstances such as the fact that the defendant is against the defendant and the crime of this case is concurrent crimes under the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act.

However, considering the circumstances in which the Defendant asserts, the act of transferring the means of access for electronic financial transactions is highly likely to be used for other crimes, and thus the quality of such crime is not good. Many of the means of access for the instant case may be used for other crimes, the crime of fraud of this case is not good, and the crime of fraud of this case is also committed by conclusive intentional intent, and the defendant has been punished ten times prior to the instant case, and there are many kinds of records that the defendant had been punished for the same crime as the crime of the instant violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, and among them, the defendant's age, character, character, intelligence, intelligence and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the punishment imposed by the court below shall be appropriate and it shall not be deemed unfair because it is excessively unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.