The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant, at around 06:50 on July 10, 2017, committed a dispute with the victim on the ground that the Defendant and the victim D (25 years old) who had been fluencing and prepared to conduct a brucing with the inmates in the same room, even though he prepared to conduct a brucing with a view to eating with the inmates in the same room, he did not help the Defendant and was flucing in the confinement room, and was flucing with the victim without helping the Defendant, while making a brucing dispute with the victim. The Defendant flucing him once with the victim, and flucing him on the part of the victim, who was flucing with the victim, and flucing him on the part of the victim.

In this respect, the defendant assaulted the victim.

2. We examine the judgment. The above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the victim can be acknowledged the fact that he/she has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant on October 13, 2017, after the above indictment was instituted. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.