The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged was known to the Defendant by holding the Victim B (20 S, n, n) and around June 2016 as “C” and contacted for a weak month.

There is a gap between them.

The defendant does not want to communicate with the victim.

On January 10, 2017, from around 23:00 to around 01:00 on the following day, the victim made a request for a conversation through the victim's Facebook and misrepresented to a third party, and the defendant seems to post the victim's photo and the victim's new sound recording file at the time of making a contact before towing on the Internet, the appointment notice will be tamped on the victim's image prepared for the public announcement, and the victim's threat was made by notifying the surrounding people of the harm and injury.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act;

(b) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 283 (3) of the Criminal Act.

(c) Submission of an agreement to withdraw wishing to punish victims on February 16, 2017, which is subsequent to the institution of public prosecution;

(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;