Text
1. The defendant's notary public against the plaintiff prepared on October 22, 2008 the White Law Office of Law Firm Dominate.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The status of the parties is as follows: (a) the Plaintiff was a person who received a subsidy from the Si of Jung-Eup and carried out the “C-Export Special Complex Development Project”; and (b) the Defendant is a representative director D of a limited-liability company that carried out the construction of the facility that was carried out as part of the project
B. On April 207, 2007, the regular Eup/Myeon decided to grant subsidies to the “C Export Special Complex Development Project” (hereinafter “C Export Special Complex Development Project”). Around August 24, 2007, the regular Eup/Myeon decided to grant subsidies of KRW 750,000,000,000,000 from the construction cost of KRW 3 billion to the farmers selected as a subsidized project operator, and KRW 1,50,000,00,000,000,000. However, in order to be selected as a subsidized project operator, the subsidized project operator should have the ability to bear the exceeding portion of the total construction cost, i.e., the portion to be borne with KRW 1,50,00,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won.
3) However, the Plaintiff deposited KRW 1.5 billion in the Han Bank account in the name of five members, including the Plaintiff, with the help of the bond company in the name of the Plaintiff, etc. who was unable to execute the self-payment, and submitted a copy of the one bank account stating the deposit details as a document proving his ability to bear the self-payment. The Plaintiff returned the entire KRW 1.5 billion to the bond company immediately after the deposit was returned. 4) On September 20, 2007, Jung-Eup selected the instant project requested by the Plaintiff as a business eligible for subsidies.
5 The Plaintiff’s business of this case on September 28, 2007.