Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 15, 2009, the Defendant forged private documents at the office of “C” located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, using a warranty protocol in the paper A4, and written a certificate of borrowing in the paper A4, and “C0 million won out of the principal (30,000,000) shall be repaid not later than January 15, 2010, and the remainder of the former ten million won (90,000,000) shall be repaid not later than July 15, 2010, and after entering “D” in the name of the obligor column, D’s seal impression was affixed.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged one copy of a loan certificate in the name of D, which is a private document concerning rights, duties, or certification of facts.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and place as Paragraph 1, issued a forged D’s loan certificate to E, who is aware of the forgery, as if it were a document duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to loan certificates, written judgments and protocol of examination of witnesses;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;