1. The Defendant’s KRW 17,791,440 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from September 17, 2014 to November 19, 2015, and the following.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of the Plaintiff’s flag B (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s vehicle”), the Plaintiff’s husband C is the driver of the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

D is the owner and driver of E truck (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant vehicle”), and the Defendant is the insurer who has concluded the comprehensive automobile insurance with D regarding the Defendant vehicle.

B. Around 10:05 on September 17, 2014, D driven the Defendant vehicle and was driven by C while straightening from a long distance without the signal, etc. at the entrance of the small-term dam at the time of racing to a reduction-up room at the long-term area, and was driven by C to turn to the left at the long-term area from the seat of the small-term dam at the seat of the Plaintiff vehicle that was driven by C.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). 【No dispute exists, Gap 1, 3, and 12 (including Serial Nos. 1, 12), Eul 1, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The grounds for liability D caused the instant accident by negligence while driving a road of 60km/h 60km at a speed exceeding 16.76km/h, and neglecting the duty of the Jeonju City. Therefore, the Defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages incurred by the Plaintiff as an insurer of the instant accident.

B. The limitation of liability: (a) the point at which the instant accident occurred is a three-distance without signal, and C did not verify whether there is a vehicle driving on the left and right side before making a left-hand turn; and (b) such error contributed to the occurrence of the instant accident and the expansion of damage; (c) therefore, the Defendant’s responsibility is limited to 40%.

3. It shall be deemed to have rejected the allegation of the parties to the scope of the liability for damages.

A. 1) Transportation Cost: 6,600,000 won (Evidence No. 4, 20): 21,837,000 won (Evidence No. 2, 5, 6, 7, 21, and 22 of the A) for repair costs: The Defendant’s inspection and maintenance parts related to the wing reduction from among the details of inspection and maintenance conducted by the F Company, and the maintenance parts related to the wing reduction and the parts related to the lower parts related to the lower parts of the lower parts, the lower parts, and the lower parts, the lower parts, and the lower parts, the exchange, and the lower parts broke.