logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.05.17 2018구합55746
감봉처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is a local administrative assistant appointed as a local public official in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on June 25, 1990 and served respectively at the Mapo-gu community service center from July 14, 2015 to June 30, 2016, and from July 1, 2016 to Mapo-gu community service center.

B. The prosecutor of the Seoul Western District Prosecutors' Office prosecuted the plaintiff against the Seoul Western District Court on the charge of injury that "the plaintiff had been working from F, the main owner of the business in Mapo-gu Seoul, about 01:30 on February 1, 2016, when he was aware that the plaintiff had been working for the plaintiff, who had been working for the plaintiff in Mapo-gu, Seoul, and he was able to say that the plaintiff was working for the plaintiff, who had been working for the plaintiff. Accordingly, he was able to say that the plaintiff was unfolded by other drinking-related diseases due to other drinking-related diseases, and caused the other drinking-related diseases to fit the left side of the victim G (the age of 66) for about 28 days," and the above court convicted the plaintiff of the above charges on December 14, 2016, and sentenced the plaintiff to a suspended sentence for 6 months and 2 years.

(2016 order 1253) c.

The plaintiff appealed against the above judgment and appealed to the above court. The prosecutor of the court of the second instance filed an appeal to the above court. The court below reversed the judgment of the court below on February 1, 2016 that "the plaintiff, around 01:30 on February 1, 2016, after hearing the words "E in Mapo-gu Seoul," he finished the business from F, a business owner, while drinking alcohol within the main point of "E" in Mapo-gu, Mapo-gu, Seoul. The plaintiff's judgment of the court below is reversed and the court below accepted the above judgment of the court below as a result of the plaintiff's negligence on the part of the plaintiff's G, which caused the plaintiff to suffer from a defect in the left-hand side of the victim's G, which caused about 4 weeks of treatment."

arrow